Use This Hack to Get the Most Out of Social Security

Getting the most out of Social Security is all about waiting as long as possible to start filing for benefits, right?

Not quite--especially if, as a business owner, you get to decide how you are paid.
You can actually live on a lot more money in retirement if you make some changes right now to your salary and take some steps to adjust your current tax bills, says Matthew Allen, a co-founder of New York City-based Social Security Advisors.

"Self-employed people generally have more flexibility in how to structure their income," he says. "That gives you a lot of good opportunities because of the way Social Security benefits are calculated."

The main tactic that Allen lays out below isn't over­whelmingly complex: Start replacing some of your salary with dividends, as long as you have a legitimate business reason to do so. (There's no required schedule for dividends, but you may wish to take them quarterly, for regular cash flow.) Meanwhile, boost your contributions to retirement savings accounts.
It's a simple enough change--but it's not a very obvious strategy until you understand how the Social Security and income tax systems work, and how the two interact.

What your current salary means

To survive in retirement, you'll obviously have to replace some of your current wages with other sources of income, including savings or pensions or government benefits. Social Security, of course, is the nation's cornerstone retirement safety net; it provided some 50.3 million retirees and survivors, or about 15 percent of Americans, with benefits in 2016. If you're planning on relying on Social Security, you probably already know that the amount you'll get at retirement varies depending on how much you've earned and paid into the system. What is less well advertised is that Social Security's benefit formula favors lower-income retirees, the assumption being that those who haven't earned high wages don't have much in savings.

Since low-wage workers are less likely to have other sources of retirement income, Social Security's graduated benefit formula gives them the highest "wage replacement" rates. Specifically, those who earned average monthly wages of $885, or $10,620 per year, get 90 percent of those wages replaced by Social Security benefits. But the replacement rate drops as you earn more, falling to just 15 percent for those earning more than $64,000 per year.

In other words, if you earn an average of $10,620 in each of the 35 years that Social Security will use to calculate your benefits, you'll be due a monthly Social Security payment of $796.50 at normal retirement age.

But if you earn 10 times that much--and pay 10 times as much in employment taxes--your monthly benefit would increase only by 3.5 times, to $2,747.92.

Can you pay yourself dividends instead?

Here's where your current tax bill comes in. You're paying Social Security taxes only on your salary, or earned income; dividend and investment income is exempt. So, as Allen suggests, you can minimize your employment tax by paying yourself partly through dividends, rather than through regular wages.

However, because this strategy will reduce your future Social Security income, it is wise to boost contributions to your retirement plans at the same time.

Let's say your business earns you $100,000 annually, of which you contribute $10,000 to your retirement plan. If you take the rest of your earnings in wages, you'll pay roughly 33 percent in employment and income taxes. But if you take $15,000 as dividends and increase your retirement contributions by $5,000 annually--thus cutting your wages by $20,000 a year--your overall tax rate drops to roughly 27 percent, for wages and dividends combined. In both cases, your after-tax take home is around $60,000--but if you adopt the latter strategy, you'll save about $5,000 in taxes each year.

Then, when retirement rolls around, you'll get slightly less in monthly Social Security benefits--about $316 per month in this example. But you'll also have dramatically more saved for retirement: about $750,000 more, assuming a 7 percent average return over 35 years. That's enough to pay you $3,322 per month for 35 years--about $3,000 more than you "lost" in Social Security benefits.

Make your dividends count

There's one big caveat. You need legitimate reasons to pay yourself dividends, rather than simply wages, for this to pass muster with the Internal Revenue Service, says Philip J. Holthouse, partner with the Los Angeles accounting firm Holthouse Carlin & Van Trigt. Otherwise, the IRS is likely to challenge your strategy and "recharacterize" your income as wages, levying the appropriate taxes and penalties in the process. And a tax court may agree.

So what are legitimate reasons to pay yourself dividends rather than wages? When a portion of your company's profits are derived from something other than your work as a "key employee."

If you employ anyone other than yourself (and any co-owners), or if you invest in machinery or equipment that is responsible for generating a portion of your company's revenue, it's considered reasonable to take wages for your work and dividends for the profit that was derived from your other employees or company assets.

There's no set formula for determining what portion of your income should be claimed as wages versus dividends. But realize that you may have to justify whatever formula you choose, so you should have a reasonable approach. You could research competitive wages in your industry and take any excess profit over that amount as a dividend, for instance. Or if you're able to directly attribute revenue to employees--or assets--that could work too.

However, the more of the company's earnings you take as dividends versus wages, the more likely you are to be questioned by the IRS, warns Holthouse. And if you run your business full time, you always have to pay yourself at least some wages.

"The idea that you could earn no wages from a business where you work full time has been pretty universally rejected by the IRS and the courts," says Holthouse. "Otherwise, if you have an argument with economic substance, you could very well win. It gets very fact-specific."

Given that this sort of dividend-income strategy could pique IRS scrutiny if misused, you may want to consult a tax professional before adopting it.

"Social Security is essentially one big math problem layered with 2,000 different rules," says Allen. However, he adds, many couples could end up collecting around $1 million in benefits over their lifetimes: "I can't think of anything else where it's as important to get it right the first time around."

Source: https://www.inc.com

2017 Estate Planning

Most people think that estate planning is for the ultra-wealthy. However, everyone needs some basic form of estate planning in order to pass their assets to the intended beneficiaries. When you die, your estate goes through a probate process and in every state this process is a little different. The goal of estate planning is to minimize the effects of probate.

If you die intestate, that means there is no estate plan or even a basic will. In this case, the probate process kicks in so your creditors are notified and the hearing becomes public information. Anyone that thinks they have a claim to your estate can petition the Probate Court for what they believe is their share of the decedent’s assets. The state then determines what happens to your assets.

The singer Prince died intestate and everyone in his family made a claim in probate court to get a share of his assets. Even relatives that he had no contact with for many years were standing there with their hands out looking for money. His assets were divided under Minnesota State Law so even his half siblings got a piece of the pie regardless of whether they were close to Prince during his life or not.

Estate planning used to be looked at as a way to save on the estate tax, or death tax as it is commonly referred to. However, as of 2017, you must have assets that exceed $5.89 million to be subject to the estate tax. If you are married and elect portability (which is a special section of the Tax Code), then that allows the surviving spouse to use the unused portion of the deceased spouse’s first estate tax exemption. Conceivably, with portability the surviving spouse could have an almost $11 million estate tax exemption. As a result, the estate tax for most people doesn’t even come into play. But as we will discuss later in this paper, estate planning can go hand in hand with tax planning.

If you die as something called testate, that means you die without any estate plan or at the very least a will. Additionally, as was mentioned earlier, every estate goes through probate and even a will can be contested.

There are two ways that assets can pass at death. One is through an act of law, meaning that someone had a trust, which is legal document that passes the assets and is out of reach from probate court. The other way that assets can pass at death is through a will, which when made public, must go through the probate process. A will can be contested and be tied up in probate court for many years.

When planning for someone’s estate and tax concerns are not evident, it is common to form a Revocable Living Trust (RLT). Revocable means that it can be changed, Living, because you are alive, and Trust meaning a legal document. There are three parties to a trust. The Grantor or Trustmaker, this is the person creating the trust. A Trustee is the person or entity that controls the assets. In a RLT the grantor is the Trustee until they die and a contingent Trustee is named. Then there are the Beneficiaries, the persons or entities that will inherit the assets of the trust.

In a trust, you can control how the assets of the trust are inherited. For instance, if a minor child is a Beneficiary of the trust, it is not uncommon to put an age limit on when they can inherit the assets. The assets earmarked to minors are just kept in the trust until the restrictions are met, and then the Trustee distributes the assets. Further, with minor children, it is not uncommon to put a drug and alcohol provision in the trust. At the discretion of the Trustee, if the minor beneficiary has a drug or alcohol problem, then they don’t inherit the assets. The assets will just stay in the trust until such a time as the beneficiary resolves their addiction. One more thing that is not uncommon is to have a stipulation in the trust that the minor child does not inherit the assets until they complete college with a 3.0 GPA.

The assets contributed to the Trust make up the corpus. An RLT is not a taxable trust, however when the grantor dies, the trust then becomes Irrevocable, meaning that it can’t be changed. The trust then has to apply for an Employer Identification Number (EIN) with the IRS. The corpus isn’t taxable, but any money that the trust makes after death is taxable to the beneficiaries. For instance, let’s say that you put a brokerage account into the trust. If the securities earn dividends or capital gains, then the beneficiaries are taxed on the income of the corpus.

Titling of Assets

The titling of assets is extremely important. In the trust document, you can list the assets that make up the trust, but in order for those assets to legally make up the corpus, they must be retitled to the trust.

Taking a trust out of the equation, you may be able to avoid an estate plan altogether if you title your assets right. Again, you need to check with state law because it varies from state to state. However, I am going to mention the most common ways to title assets along with the repercussions of each method.

First of all, you have Joint Tenants with the Right of Survivorship (JTWRS). This is commonly done with a husband and wife. If one spouse dies, the asset just passes to the surviving spouse.

Another way to title your assets is as Tenants in Common (TIC). This is generally done with an unmarried couple or friends. When one of the owners dies, the asset passes to the other person automatically.

The JTWRS and TIC are the most popular ways to title assets and more importantly, they both keep the assets out of probate court.

Giving Money to Minor Children and Other Gifts

There was an account that was common 24 years ago when I went into practice. It was called Uniform Transfers to Minors Act Accounts (UTMA). This was where you irrevocably gave assets to a child so they had full access to the account when they turned 18. Think about this for a second: When we were all 18 we were young and dumb. If I had access to any sum of money at that age, I would surely have blown it on something stupid like a sports car.

There are better ways to give children money today. One option is through an Irrevocable Trust. Irrevocable as I mentioned before, means that it can’t be changed. Just like an RLT, there are the same three parties to the trust. However, in an Irrevocable Trust, it is common to put restrictions on the assets in the trust.

To start with, an Irrevocable Trust is a taxable entity. You must apply for an EIN from the IRS. The corpus of the trust isn’t taxed but it is not uncommon to invest the corpus into securities that make money. The Trust has to file a tax return listing all of the income for the year and then that income flows to the beneficiary to be taxed on their personal return.

Irrevocable Trusts, unlike RLTs, protect assets from creditors and even divorce. They can be used to remove assets from a taxable estate and move them to the trust. If the estate tax is the reason for the trust, then under the Internal Revenue Code, the minor child must inherit the assets when they turn 21. As we mentioned above, there are restrictions that you can put on the corpus of the trust like the GPA or drug and alcohol provision, or pretty much anything you want.

Gift Tax

There is such a thing as gift tax. How it works is that you can give a person, or in this case a trust, up to $14,000 a year. If you are married and your spouse and yourself elect to split your gifts, you can give one person or trust $28,000 a year. If you go over this amount, then the excess is subtracted from your estate tax exemption and you then must file a gift tax return.

When a client is subject to the estate tax, it is a common strategy for them to give gifts, up to the gift tax limit, to everyone in their family. A completed gift, meaning the giftor has no say over the money, removes the money or asset from their taxable estate.

Another way to get money to your children while avoiding gift tax restrictions and retaining control over the asset is through a Section 529 Plan, which is used for the beneficiary’s college expenses. You can contribute up to $250,000 gift tax free to the 529. The amount in the plan is then invested and grows tax free. If the money is used for college, books, or living expenses while in college, then the distribution to the beneficiary is tax free. The best part of a 529 Plan is that the parents own the account and the only way the child can access the funds is through the parents.

Where Asset Protection, Tax Planning and Estate Planning Intersect

Since the estate tax isn’t much of a concern for a majority of the population, when completing an estate plan, it is not uncommon to do asset protection at the same time. With asset protection, there has to be tax planning.

Most business owners are familiar with basic asset protection. They set their businesses up as corporations or limited liability companies to protect their personal assets in case the company is sued.

Asset protection can basically be explained as protecting your assets so that if a claim is filed, the assets that would be in jeopardy would be at an absolute minimum.

Before every state had laws favoring limited liability companies (LLCs), it was not uncommon in asset protection to form a family limited partnership (FLP). The FLP has a general partner, which is usually a shell corporation controlled by the senior members of the family. Additionally, the FLP can have an infinare number of partners that have no say in the FLP.

Today it is more common to use a family limited liability company (FLLC), which is made up of managers and members. You can also have the title of managing-member and act as a general partner. Again, they are basically shell corporations run by the senior members of the FLLC while the members, as limited partners, have no control over the FLLC.

Assets such as real estate are moved to the FLLC to protect them from creditors. However, the person doing the asset protection has created a taxable entity and if the assets are not contributed to the FLLC in the right way, you have also generated a gift tax event.

In order to stop an accidental gift tax event, simply form the FLLC, give the members and managers their share of the FLLC, and then place the assets into the FLLC. This protects from an unintended gift tax situation. Then the FLLC is a taxable entity, which would need tax planning if the assets that are moved to the FLLC produce income.

Some people, when doing estate planning or asset protection, are looking for ways to pass the family business to their children. One way to do this is to form a Grantor Annuity Remainder Trust (GRAT). A GRAT does a few things. For one, it freezes the asset, meaning it removes it from the estate. The owner of the business sells the business to the GRAT for a certain amount of money.

For instance, let’s say that the business is sold for $1 million to the GRAT. The GRAT now owns the business, the grantor is the business owner, the trustee is the business owner, and the beneficiaries of the trust are whomever the business is passing to. The term of the GRAT can be 10 years or 20 years. Over the period of 10 or 20 years, the money that is earned from the business is paid as an annuity with interest to the owner.

As another example, let’s say that a business owner sells his business to a GRAT for $1 million with the term of the GRAT at 10 years. The beneficiaries of the GRAT are the children and the interest rate paid to the owner is 3%. The GRAT would pay the business owner $103,000 a year over 10 years with this money paid out from the current income of the business. After 10 years, the business is worth $2 million and then the beneficiaries of the GRAT inherit the business with a basis of $1 million.

CAUTION: By placing the business into a GRAT, the asset is removed from the estate and the amount of the asset is frozen at the value at the time of sale. HOWEVER, if the owner dies while the GRAT is still in place, the value of the business at the time of death is added back to the estate. Also, if the company is owned by the GRAT and is an S-Corporation, a new Form 2553 (Election to Be Taxed as an S-Corporation) needs to be refiled with a Q-Sub Election.

Most businesses are set up as S-Corporations which can only have one class of stock. Usually, senior members of the family want to sell their business to their children but for various reasons they don’t want to lose control of the corporation. What they can then do is split the shares between voting shares and non-voting shares, the voting shares being given to the senior member of the family. Under normal circumstances, the voting shares are divided by 1% of the voting shares, given to the owner of the business. This is made up all of the outstanding voting shares. The owner of he business would then sell on an installment sale 99% of the non-voting shares to an Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (IDGT). The intentionally defective trust is created as a grantor trust with a purposeful flaw that ensures that the individual continues to pay income taxes, as income tax laws will not recognize assets that have been transferred away from the individual.

The beneficiaries of the IDGT are usually the children of the senior family member. The beauty of an IDGT is that the money that is used to pay the owner comes from the current income of the company. In addition, if the company is an S-Corporation, the owner holds all the voting shares and can pay themselves distributions out of the S-Corporation.

For example, let’s say you have an owner with an S-Corporation. He wants to sell the business to his children but doesn’t want the money to come out of the kids’ pockets. In addition, the owner isn’t ready to retire and wants to maintain control of the S-Corporation. He would form an IDGT, then split his common shares into voting and non-voting shares. 1% of the value of the outstanding shares are the voting shares that the owner retains, and the 99% of the voting shares are transferred to the IDGT for $2 million paid over 10 years. The owner would receive $200,000 a year for ten years. The money doesn’t come out of his kids’ pockets, instead it is paid from the current income of the business. In addition, to supplement the owner’s income, they can take monthly distributions from the company.

As with the GRAT, the IDGT freezes the asset at the selling price to the trust. However, unlike the GRAT, if the owner dies while the IDGT is in effect, the business stays out of the owner’s estate. One thing to remember with an S-Corporation is just like a GRAT, you have to refile the S-Corporation Election (Form 2553) as a Q-Sub Election.

Estate Planning for Blended Families

When the estate tax exemption was lower and portability didn’t yet exist, it was common to use a strategy like an AB Trust. Pre-portability, an AB Trust was meant to transfer to the surviving spouse the decedent’s unused estate tax exemption. Since we now have portability, an AB Trust or ABC Trust can be used for blended families.

This is useful and necessary in the light of the fact that in the US, the divorce rate is 50%. Plus, many people that divorce marry again. The spouses typically bring children from other marriages with them, thus the creation of somewhat financially complicated blended families

In a blended family situation, we understand that the husband and wife may love each other very much, however, there are often concerns about what the surviving spouse will do with the entire estate when the first spouse passes away.  For example, if Husband has three children from a previous marriage and Wife has two children of her own, Husband may be concerned that if he passes away first, his Wife may end up leaving the entire estate to her two children and completely disinherit his three children. Wife may have the same exact concerns if she were the first to pass away.

As a result, estate planners use a special type of trust to alleviate these concerns.  It is known as an AB trust, which is a typical revocable living trust for during the Husband and Wife's lifetimes. However, it is also a contract between Husband and Wife that provides that, at the death of the first spouse, two trusts must be created: Trust A and Trust B.  Trust A will hold the survivor's half of the community property and all of the survivor's separate property, and Trust B will hold the decedent's half of the community property and all of the decedent's separate property.

Generally, the surviving spouse becomes the Trustee over both Trust A and Trust B and can have access to both trusts during his or her lifetime for the survivor’s benefit.  The rules are that the survivor is in complete control of Trust A and can do whatever he or she deems appropriate with that half of the estate.  The survivor may choose to amend Trust A to disinherit the deceased spouse's children or the survivor can leave Trust A intact and it would go to both Husband and Wife's children equally when the survivor passes away.  

The survivor is not in complete control of Trust B, however, and the survivor is not permitted to change the beneficiaries of Trust B because Trust B becomes irrevocable at the death of the first spouse. This is meant to offer protection for the deceased spouse and ensure that at least part of the estate will ultimately go to the children that the deceased spouse had originally planned to leave the estate to.

Another way to do estate planning for blended families is through a Qualified Terminable Interest Property (QTIP) Trust. A QTIP trust is therefore particularly useful in second marriages because the client can provide for a spouse by putting assets in trust with the income going to the spouse, but can also dictate that the assets go to the client’s children and not the spouse’s children after the death of the spouse.

A QTIP trust can also add tax-planning flexibility because it does not qualify for the marital deduction until the executor affirmatively elects to claim the deduction, and the executor can still have the discretion as to whether to make the election for all, none or a part of the trust in order to minimize estate taxes. Laws in some states limit executor powers in this regard.

Estate Planning for Charitable Concerns

There are a lot of ways to add charitable considerations to your estate plan. One way to do this while receiving a tax deduction at the same time is through a Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust (CRAT). A CRAT works best when you donate appreciable property to the CRAT, but you can also contribute cash. The CRAT has a cousin called a Charitable Remainder Unitrust (CRUT). The difference between the two is that with a CRAT, you can only make a one-time contribution. With a CRUT, you can make a contribution each year.

Let’s say that you want to pay for private primary school for your kids but you want to make those payments to the school tax deductible, when they ordinarily aren’t. You could contribute either cash or appreciable assets to the CRAT or CRUT and receive a tax deduction.

For example, let’s say that you have a portfolio where you have a basis of $2 million. If you were to sell the portfolio, you could sell it for $3 million. This would leave you with a taxable gain of $1 million that would be subject to 23.8% tax. With a CRAT, you would simply donate the portfolio to the Trust. The trust then sells the portfolio and now you have $3 million in the trust. You don’t have a taxable gain from the sale.

The longest term of a CRAT or CRUT is 20 years. In that time, the trust pays you a 5% annuity per year. That would be $150,000 a year for 20 years for a total of $3 million. However, the CRAT or CRUT reinvests the $3 million into other securities and makes $1 million. You would receive a $1 million charitable deduction and at the end of the 20-year term, the $1 million going to the charity of your choice.

If you are anything like me, you don’t trust a lot of charities. For a non-profit to see a donation from me, I need to first investigate their Form 990 (Tax Return for Exempt Organizations), which is open for public inspection. By examining this form you will find that oftentimes, about 60% of every dollar given to a charity is eaten up by administrative costs and fundraising. The other 40% will actually go to the charitable endeavor. That being said, the beneficiary of the CRAT or CRUT has to be an IRC § 501(c)(3) organization. Why not start your own 501(c)(3) organization so that you can control exactly how the money of the CRAT or CRUT is spent?

Life Estates

In a life estate, two or more people each have an ownership interest in a property, but for different periods of time. The person holding the life estate -- the life tenant -- possesses the property during his or her life. The other owner -- the remainderman -- has a current ownership interest but cannot take possession until the death of the life estate holder. The life tenant has full control of the property during his or her lifetime and has the legal responsibility to maintain the property as well as the right to use it, rent it out, and make improvements to it.

When the life tenant dies, the house will not go through probate, since at the life tenant's death the ownership will pass automatically to the holders of the remainder interest. Because the property is not included in the life tenant's probate estate, it can avoid Medicaid estate recovery in states that have not expanded the definition of estate recovery to include non-probate assets. Even if the state does place a lien on the property to recoup Medicaid costs, the lien will be for the value of the life estate, not the full value of the property.

Although the property will not be included in the probate estate, it will be included in the taxable estate. Depending on the size of the estate and the state's estate tax threshold, the property may be subject to estate taxation.

Taxable Basis of Gifts and Inherited Property

One thing to keep in mind when making a gift or when someone inherits property, is that the person receives the gift or inheritance on a taxable basis. To figure out the gain on the sale of property, you subtract the selling price from the basis of the taxpayer. Basis is what the asset was bought for plus any improvements made to the property, or any fees paid to acquire the asset.

If you gift property, the person receiving the gift inherits the basis of the person giving the gift. For instance, let’s say that I bought Disney Stock in the 70’s for $25 a share. I initially bought 1000 shares, but the stock split 2 to 1 in 1990. Now I have 2000 shares at the original basis of $25,000. This is where knowledge of the Tax Code comes in. First of all, I can only give a gift of $14,000 to any one person in a year. However, as the tax planner, I have to think of the taxable effect to the person receiving the gift. Let’s say that the client’s Disney stock is now worth $100,000. The advice to the client is to give the person receiving the gift, after the sale of the asset, $37,950 or less, and there will be no income tax owed by the person receiving the gift, and no gift tax return that would have to be filed for the person giving the gift.

The tax brackets for single people making $9,325 or less is 10%. If they make up to $37,950, then they are in the 15% tax bracket. The sale of the stock by the person receiving the gift would be taxed at a capital gain. However, if that person has no income for the year and this is the only income they will have, they can receive up to $37,950 of capital income and not pay any taxes on the money. That is to say, if you have capital income and you are in the 10% or 15% tax bracket, then the taxes owed are zero.

What you don’t want to do is give a gift of something like a house that has a basis of $30,000 but is worth $100,000 today. The person giving the gift would have to file a gift tax return and the person receiving the gift would have a capital gain of $60,000.

The basis of someone inheriting an asset is different from someone receiving the asset as a gift. If I inherit an asset, my taxable basis is the value of the asset on the date of death. Typically, it is best for a person receiving an asset as an inheritance to get an appraisal of the asset as close to the date of death as possible. That way, if audited, the person receiving the inheritance has proof of the basis of the asset.

Conclusion

As you can see, estate planning is not just for the ultra-wealthy. Further, you need an attorney to draw up the documents, as well as a tax accountant that specializes in estate taxation to minimize the taxable effect of the estate or asset planning.

Source: http://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com

Accounting method change procedures under the new revenue recognition standards

On March 28, 2017, the IRS issued Notice 2017-17 providing proposed procedures that, if finalized, may be used in certain circumstances to request consent to change a method of accounting for recognizing income related to the adoption of the new financial accounting revenue recognition standards. In addition, the notice requested comments on the proposed procedures plus various issues, including several raised previously in Notice 2015-40 published on June 15, 2015. The comment period closed July 24, 2017.

New accounting standard

On May 28, 2014, new financial accounting standards were issued for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The new standards are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2018, for most taxpayers. However, publicly traded entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans must implement the standards one year earlier (i.e., for annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2017). FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606), applies a five-step analysis to all contracts with customers to transfer goods and services (other than leases, insurance, financial instruments, guarantees, and non-monetary exchanges between entities in the same line of business, as described in ASC Paragraph 606-10-15-2. (For more on the five steps required to determine the amount of revenue to recognize under the new standard, see Bocchino, et al., "Evolving Revenue Recognition Issues: Manufacturers," The Tax Adviser (June 2016).)

Revenue recognition principles and accounting method change procedures

Under federal tax principles, revenue is generally recognized using the "all-events" test under Sec. 451 when the taxpayer has (1) a fixed right to receive the revenue (usually the earliest of when the revenue is due, received, or earned) and (2) the amount can be determined with reasonable accuracy. In some circumstances, certain advance payments received from the provision of goods, services, and other eligible sources may be deferred for one to two tax years.Changing how revenue and/or advance payments are recognized for tax purposes often constitutes a change in accounting method that requires IRS consent to implement (i.e., by filing Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method). In general, IRS consent is requested under the advance consent procedures described in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, which require Form 3115 to be filed with the IRS National Office by the last day of the year of change, along with the user fee payment outlined in Rev. Proc. 2017-1. However, changes the IRS designated as "automatic" (currently, in Rev. Proc. 2017-30) must be requested using the "automatic" consent procedures, which do not require a user fee and are filed in duplicate with the timely filed (including extensions) federal income tax return for the year of change and with the IRS Service Center in Covington, Ky.

Potential tax implications

Software, entertainment, manufacturing, and construction taxpayers may be particularly affected by the new revenue recognition standards due to the prevalence in those industries of certain business practices and accounting methods such as:

  • The percentage-of-completion method;
  • Income from services;
  • Revenue from bill-and-hold sale transactions;
  • Sales and returns of goods; and
  • Income from the sale of warranties.In addition to the impact on the timing of recognizing revenue, the new standards may have implications for other tax and business areas such as:
  • Tax payments and cash flow planning due to the expected acceleration of taxable income under the new rules;
  • Income tax provisions, which may need to reflect additional temporary differences and deferred taxes (e.g., if the timing of revenue recognition differs for book and tax purposes under the new standards);
  • State apportionment, which may require additional analysis to determine sales data by state;
  • Indirect taxes, especially for states that tax gross receipts and net worth;
  • Foreign subsidiaries' earnings-and-profits calculations and foreign tax credits;
  • Transfer-pricing agreements, especially those based on revenue or profit measures reported in financial statements; and
  • Compensation agreements tied to revenue.

IRS guidance and proposed automatic accounting method change procedures

In Notice 2015-40 the IRS requested comments on federal tax accounting issues related to the adoption of the new standards, including:

  • Whether the new standards are permissible methods of accounting for federal income tax purposes;
  • The types of accounting method change requests likely to result from adopting the new standards; and
  • If the current accounting method change procedures adequately accommodate such requests.

Notice 2017-17 provides proposed procedures to request consent to change a method of accounting for recognizing income related to the adoption of the new financial accounting revenue recognition standards. In addition, noting that very few comments had been received in response to Notice 2015-40, the notice once again requested comments on various technical and implementation issues, and on the proposed accounting method change procedures.

Key provisions in the proposed procedures include:

  • Qualifying same-year method changes: The proposed automatic method change procedures apply only to a "qualifying same-year method change," which is defined as "a change of method of accounting for recognizing income that is made for the same year as the year the taxpayer adopts the new standards and made as a result of, or directly related to, the adoption of those standards.
  • Existing automatic change: A qualifying same-year method change that is included in the list of automatic changes under Rev. Proc. 2017-30, and otherwise meets the automatic change eligibility requirements in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, must be implemented using the existing automatic change procedures.
  • No existing automatic change: Alternatively, a taxpayer making a qualifying same-year method change that is not included in the list of automatic changes but that complies with Sec. 451 or other guidance, and meets the automatic change eligibility provisions in Rev. Proc. 2015-13, must file Form 3115 under the automatic change procedures, write "Rev. Proc. [and its number, when finalized]" followed by the applicable citation to Sec. 451 or other relevant legal authority on line 1(b) of Form 3115, and attach a brief description of the change and why it satisfies the authorities referenced in line 1(b).
  • Cutoff method for small taxpayers: In an effort to reduce the administrative burden of implementing accounting method changes related to the new revenue recognition standards, certain small taxpayers are permitted to make the change on a cutoff basis (i.e., without a Sec. 481(a) adjustment). An eligible small taxpayer is a taxpayer with one or more separate trade(s) or business(es) that individually have (1) total assets of less than $10 million as of the first day of the tax year of change, or (2) average annual gross receipts of $10 million or less for the three tax years preceding the change year. For purposes of applying the small taxpayer exception, separate and distinct trades or businesses and average annual gross receipts are determined under Regs. Secs. 1.446-1(d) and 1.263(a)-3(h)(3) (substituting "separate and distinct trade or business" for "taxpayer").
  • A Sec. 481(a) adjustment must be computed for the year of change for all separate and distinct trades or businesses other than those meeting the small taxpayer thresholds described above.
  • Multiple requests to make qualifying same-year method changes may be made in one request.

Implications

Although the proposed guidance is not effective until finalized, it provides helpful insight into the approach the IRS intends to take with respect to granting tax accounting method changes related to the new revenue recognition standards. In particular, the ability to make changes using the more favorable automatic change procedures (which allow additional time to file Form 3115 and do not require payment of a user fee) and to permit small taxpayers to reduce the compliance burden using a cutoff method are welcome developments. Moreover, allowing the small taxpayer thresholds to be applied at the trade or business level, rather than in aggregate, should enable more taxpayers to qualify for the simplified cutoff approach. Note, however, that if finalized in their current form, these favorable procedures will be available only for a limited time (i.e., tax method changes must be implemented in the same year the new standards are adopted).

Presumably, taxpayers that fail to file otherwise nonautomatic method changes within the prescribed time frame would be required to apply for consent under the more onerous and costlier advance consent procedures. Therefore, taxpayers are advised to begin the process of assessing the impact of the new revenue standards on their current revenue recognition tax accounting methods so they are prepared to implement any necessary accounting method changes within the time specified in the final procedures. While the effective dates of the new revenue recognition standard may appear far off, the transition process is expected to require significant time to complete, given the broad scope and complexity of the newrules.

Therefore, taxpayers and their tax advisers should act now to evaluate and plan for the tax implications of the new financial revenue recognition standards, starting with identifying which revenue streams are affected by the new standards. Once the affected revenues are identified, taxpayers should then evaluate whether tax accounting method changes are necessary or desired to change to compliant methods or to follow the new book accounting method. At the same time, taxpayers can evaluate their systems and books and records to determine whether they currently track the necessary data to continue using the current revenue recognition methods.

Source: https://www.thetaxadviser.com